The only
liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal that has been
built in the Bay of Fundy is continuing to explore how the
facility can remain viable, following the rapid growth in the
amount of natural gas being extracted from shale rock in the
northeastern U.S. The
Canaport LNG import terminal in Saint John recently received
approval from the provincial Department of Environment and
Local Government to reload LNG back onto ships, along with a
short-term order from the National Energy Board to export
LNG. Canaport has not yet set a date for when it might begin
exporting LNG, says Canaport LNG media contact Kate Shannon.
She explains, "Our terminal has the necessary equipment to
load LNG onto LNG tankers. The process will remain the same,
but in reverse. We will use existing equipment, and all
existing safety processes will remain in place."
She adds, "The approval of this
permit allows us to have more flexibility and an additional
option to maximize the use of our terminal. LNG would
potentially be shipped out to other markets globally. Our
terminal is able to meet fluctuating market demand at any
given time, and as such, our send-out volumes fluctuate
throughout the year."
Barbara Shook, senior
reporter-at-large for Energy Intelligence Group in Houston,
says that Canaport is looking at exporting LNG "because they
have no market at all in the Northeast. Their LNG is so much
more expensive than the domestic LNG." She expects that
Canaport might export to European markets, noting that the
natural gas price in New England is around $4.50 to $4.75 per
million btu, while it is over $11 in Great Britain.
LNG imports at Canaport expected to drop
dramatically
According to Bentek
Energy, an energy market analytics company, Canaport is
expected to receive only five deliveries from Qatargas this
year. The imports help serve peak winter demand in the New
England market through the Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline.
However, Canaport has only a three-year contract with
Qatargas that expires at the end of this year. Bentek
forecasts that LNG imports to Canaport will drop dramatically
next year and that the terminal will receive an average of
4.8 billion cubic feet a year under the sole import contract
with Royal Dutch Shell. In February, Shell had purchased all
of Repsol's LNG assets, except Canaport, which Shell had
decided not to purchase because of the decline in LNG imports
at the Saint John facility. Repsol and Shell, though, did
sign an agreement for Shell to supply one million tons of LNG
to the terminal over a 10-year period, which is just over 1%
of its capacity, if Canaport was operating at its maximum
capacity of 1.2 billion cubic feet a day.
According to the U.S.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), during the winter of
2013 the LNG send-out from Canaport was 42% lower than the
previous winter. From May 2012 to January 2013, Canaport
deliveries to the U.S. averaged 100 million cubic feet per
day, which Shook describes as "a minor send-out." Operating
at maximum capacity, the Canaport send-out could be 10 times
as much. Meanwhile, natural gas production in the
northeastern U.S. rose from 2.1 billion cubic feet per day in
2008 to 12.3 Bcf/d in 2013.
Between 2008 and 2013 the
natural gas net inflow from eastern Canada to the
northeastern U.S. fell by 82%, according to the EIA. Lower
production at the Sable Island gas fields and higher demand
in eastern Canada contributed to the decrease in natural gas
imports. Also, the U.S. began exporting compressed natural
gas to Canada by truck from Baileyville.
As for whether
Canaport might add liquefaction capacity to convert natural
gas to LNG and export from domestic sources, Shook questions
whether the Saint John facility would receive approval from
the U.S. government to import gas from the U.S. and then
export it. She doubts that there would be any natural gas
source in Canada, since there is as yet no hydro-fracking of
the "trillions of cubic feet" of shale gas in New Brunswick
because of concerns about the impact of fracking.
Shook says that
Canaport, which began operating in 2009, "was a good idea at
the time," which was before the domestic shale gas boom. She
notes that nine pipelines from the U.S. run through the
Marcellus and Utica shale gas fields, which stretch from Ohio
and West Virginia into New York state, and they are all
empty. They are being revamped so that their flow patterns
will be reversed to go from north to south, since there is a
growing natural gas market in the southeastern U.S. for power
generation, or they are being converted to handle liquid gas
or oil for the southeast.
"We need more pipelines
out of the Marcellus field to the Northeast," Shook says,
adding, "Gas is a lot cheaper than fuel oil and a whole lot
cleaner."
Two pipelines did recently
announce that they would be reversing their flows to
transport Marcellus shale gas to northern New England and
eastern Canada. On December 3, both the Iroquois Gas
Transmission System and Portland Natural Gas Transmission
System launched open seasons offering capacity on their
pipelines to transport gas from the Marcellus field. The
Portland pipeline had been built to bring natural gas from
Canada into the U.S.
|